Today began with crisp bright sunshine but by mid afternoon the cloud had moved in. It doesn’t feel significantly warmer/less cold thought. In fact, if anything it feels colder with the damper air. According to my weather app the temperature is 2° as compared with -1° at 8.30 this morning. It also tells me that it’s snowing, which is not true but may be well happening in other, possibly higher, bits of Saddleworth.
Considering that the cold snap is apparently going to be around for a few more days, I have dug out thermal underwear and a pair of fleecy lined leggings that I purchased last winter. According to Marks and Spencer, these are not leggings but footless tights, the kind of thing that ballerinas used to wear, at least in all the girls’ magazine stories about ballerinas.
I’ve also found my wooly bobble hats. But according to fashion writers, this year we should be wearing “micro beanies”. These are little wooly hats, with the main part rolled up so that the hat sits above your ears. “Worn high across the forehead, these bijou beanies are purposely rolled up by wearers, leaving their ears exposed to the elements. With roots in maritime and military settings – they were originally rolled up to avoid any obstruction to hearing – they are sometimes called fisherman or watch caps. But rather than being worn on the high seas, they are now sported by creative types in offices and coffee shops from London to Lancaster.”
“Bijou beanies” indeed! What a load of nonsense. Surely the whole point of a wooly hat is to keep your head warm, your whole head, including your ears, not just the top of your head. In fact, out running over the last few days I have worn a beanie and then pulled up the hood of my warm running-top! We were advised long ago by the chess player David Bronstein about the importance of keeping your head warm.
Personally, I think it equally important to keep your feet warm and to that end I have been filling hot water bottles before we go to bed.
But fashion dictates what we should wear and sometimes we dress to impress rather than to be sensible. I wonder if that was the case with the young man I saw in our local Tesco wearing very short shorts, showing off his tanned legs. Maybe he had been playing football but I think that is unlikely as the football pitches around here are still covered on snow.
Apparently some people are getting agitated about the money that was spent of the coronation of King Charles: at least £72m. The cost of policing the ceremony was £21.7m, with a further £50.3m in costs racked up by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Quite how the Department for Culture, Media and Sport managed to spend that extra I have no idea, but there it is.
I seem to remember that when Juan Carlos abdicated in favour of his son, now King Felipe of Spain, that there was very little ceremony. However, it appears that our Charles insisted on having a big parade. Mind you, I suppose that if you have waited until you are in your seventies to become king, then you might want to make a big thing of it.
The coronation has been described as a “once-in-a-generation moment” that enabled the “entire country to come together in celebration”, as well as offering “a unique opportunity to celebrate and strengthen our national identity and showcase the UK to the world”. A bit of British showing-off, in other words.
Needless to say, we didn’t watch it.
Life goes on. Stay safe and well, everyone!