I have been receiving reminder emails from the library, reminding me that I have an overdue book to return. On a number of occasions in the last week or so I have been out and about with the smaller grandchildren, occasions when I could have popped into one or other of the branches of our library to return the aforementioned book. The small grandchildren would not have objected as they enjoy a visit to the library. However, I only remembered after the event. It’s a good job they no longer fine us for overdue books!
Libraries these days are on the whole child-friendly, still calm and quiet places but not quite the austere establishments of my childhood, with strict librarians who told you off if you tried to return a book too soon, in a length of time during which they felt you could not possibly have read that book. This happened to me during summer holidays in my childhood.
Now both the small grandchildren regularly take part in the library’s summer reading challenge, an excellent scheme for encouraging children to read more. Here’s a Tom Gauld cartoon on how to be a top reader:
According to something I read this morning, your response to the doorbell ringing varies according to your age. Who knew that there was such a form of age discrimination. Millennials and Gen Z would not dream of answering the door without knowing who it was. If fact, most Gen Z would not bother ringing the doorbell at all but would simply text to say they were outside the door. Boomers like us apparently leap to answer the door - as far as they are still able to actually leap up. (Some members of our family text to tell us they are outside if we don’t manage to leap up fast enough.) Gen X, according to Polly Hudson, who wrote the article, are caught in the middle: one instinct says to open the door while another urges the caution of Gen Z. We have a notice on our door discouraging cold callers, canvassers, religious nutters and the like. However, we want another notice to tell deliverymen PLEASE to ring the doorbell, rather than tap-tapping quietly with their knuckles.
As the problem of migrants in boats continues in various places, including the English Channel, it seems the Reform Uk (who like to inform us of what they will do when they are in power, which hopefully is a pipe dream) proposes that the navy should be deployed to stop the boats. A former naval officer has criticised this idea, stating that the UK’s warships would be better used countering actual military threats. “A billion-pound warship that’s configured for anti-air warfare or anti-submarine warfare, which are both threats to the UK, is not best used ferrying people around. You’re better off using an actual ferry,” said the retired Royal Naval Cmdr Tom Sharpe. Meanwhile Reform Uk’s political opponents suggest that all this policy declaration stuff is a distraction tactic, to divert attention away from Nigel Farage’s misdemeanours! Hmm!
Life foes on. Stay safe and well, everyone!

















