It might still be grey and damp as February rushes to its end but there are increasing signs that spring is not too far away. This morning I saw the first almost-open daffodils on my running route. Other parts of the country may well have glorious displays of daffs by now but, apart from clumps of miniature daffodils, these are the first I have seen around her.
The Green Party has won the Gorton and Denton by-election, which is good. A worryingly large number of people voted for Reform. It is to be hoped that this was a protest vote rather than an indication that people have been taken in by grinning Farage.
Nazir Afzal, chancellor of the University of Manchester and a former chief prosecutor, wrote this article for the Guardian’s Opinion column. He makes the interesting point that in so many aspects of his life he is just himself, without an identified religious label. He is not the MUSLIM chancellor of the University of Manchester, for example. But as chief prosecutor for North-west England suddenly he was the “Muslim prosecutor” and investigating grooming gangs he was the “Muslim decision maker”. We live in a multicultural country, whether the far right likes it or not. If we look back at our history most of us are descended from immigrants of one kind or another. We need to accept people as they are, without putting labels on anyone, especially labels which are intended to divide us.
Fashion is a strange thing. We are all of us judged one way or another for the way we look, the way we dress, how we style our hair, whether we wear lots of makeup and paint our nails, or indeed add long extensions to those nails! We look at people and make snap judgements about their political views, whether they are left- or right-leaning, whether we need to feel threatened by them, whether we can feel comfortable talking to them.
Justine Picardie, former editor-in-chief of Harper’s Bazaar UK has written a book called “Fashioning the Crown: A Story of Power, Conflict and Couture”, maintaining that what the members of our royal family wear is a political statement of sorts. And according to this article the appearance of King Charles at the opening of London Fashion Week and that the Prince and Princess of Wales at the Baftas was a sign that the royal family was going about business as usual, despite the much-publicised misbehaviour of a certain former prince.
And even the fact that Catherine had worn her Bafta dress on another occasion was a sign that she is taking a sustainable approach and showing restraint. Goodness! I can remember a time when Queen Letitia of Spain got press for wearing the same outfit twice.
It’s been going on forever it seems, this political statement via fashion. Justine Picardie, points out that the “after the crisis of the abdication in 1936, when Queen Elizabeth (the Queen Mother) was dressed by Norman Hartnell in an idealised vision of traditional Englishness, to counteract the hard chic of the pro-Nazi Duke and Duchess of Windsor.”
Even the fabric used for clothes can be significant. “Picardie notes an example from 1947 when, in the aftermath of the second world war, then prime minister Clement Attlee expressed his concern over whether the silk for Princess Elizabeth’s wedding dress had been produced by Japanese or Italian silk worms. Thankfully, the fabric was made in China.”
Hmmm! Would Chinese silk be acceptable nowadays? I wonder.
The late queen’s outfits were often scrutinised for political messages: the Brexit hat, the choice of jewellery and so on. The royal family is supposed to stay out of politics so maybe choosing your clothing to match the occasion you have to attend is one way of making a statement. Who knew!
It’s there in all our lives too. We can show solidarity by way we dress. In recent months I have attended a funeral where we were asked to wear the colours of Palestine and another where we were asked to wear suffragette colours.
Choose your outfit with care!
Life goes on. Stay safe and well, everyone!














