Apologies and reparations seem to be the thing at the moment. The King and the Prime Minister are both in the Bahamas and there’s a lot of talk about slavery. We should apologise and pay large amounts of money in reparation.
So here’s a Ben Jennings cartoon on slavery reparations.
I read that the Prime Minister plans to ask countries affected by the Uk’s role in slavery to help form our country’s apology. And he has approved £40m in aid funding for the Caribbean
The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, says that making slavery reparations would be ‘a vast unjust fine on the British people”.
“You may be able to fine individual people for their conduct, but not everyone for their nationality,” states Mr Welby. And as he points out, most of us did not get rich on the proceeds of slavery. Indeed some of the people whose taxes and so on would help pay the reparations are in fact descended from slaves. We need to hold up our hands and accept responsibility for stuff that went on in the past but the whole issue is very complicated.
The King, by the way, found time to dance and play bells in a parade and the Prime Minister managed to play cricket. Serious stuff!
I’ve found another “word of the year”, this time selected by Collins English Dictionary. The word is “mogging” which apparently means outperforming or outshining someone or something. It is said to originate from “Amog” - alpha male in the group - a word that first appeared in bodybuilding culture around 2016. It’s now gone into everyday slang: “Teenagers mog elite athletes, a new video game mogs an old favourite, and your friend’s sourdough mogs the loaf you spent all weekend proving, Basically, if someone or something has made you look a bit rubbish by comparison, you’ve been mogged.”
Who knew? I am completely out of touch with the world of slang. I must consult the grandchildren.
Michael Rosen posted something from Rural Historia:
“Imagine having to move a canal boat through a dark tunnel using nothing but your legs.
This was known as “legging” — a method used to propel boats through canal tunnels and water-filled adits before motorised boats became common.
Many early canal tunnels were built without towpaths because adding one would have required a much wider tunnel, making construction considerably more expensive.
That created a problem: once the tow horse was detached, how did you get the boat through?
The answer was legging.
Crewmen would lie on their backs or sides on planks fitted to the boat and literally “walk” along the tunnel wall or roof with their feet, pushing the boat slowly forward through the darkness.
It was hard, awkward and exhausting work, but for many years it was one of the few practical ways of getting an unpowered boat through a long tunnel.
A wonderfully simple solution to a very expensive engineering problem.”
I’ve heard of this before as Standedge Tunnel is not far from here in Marsden. I think it’s even possible to take boatbtrips along the canal and through the the rather impressive tunnel.
Thw first comment on Michael Rosen’s post was this’
“If I remember correctly, the canal owners did not wish their tunnel walls and roofs to be damaged by the clogs of the boatmen, so often insisted that their clogs were wrapped in bits of cloth to give some protection to the brickwork/stonework.
Hence the origin of the term “toe-rag”..”
Interesting stuff.
Life goes on. Stay safe and well, everyone.














