As I ran round up the road this morning, feeling rather pleased that it was cool enough for me to feel like running rather than just walking rather slowly, I became aware of a flapping sound. This happens quite frequently. It means that the lace on one of my trainers has come undone. On this occasion it was both shoes! Before I set off to run I slip my feet into my trainers and step out of the door. Then I put one foot after the other on the garden wall to fasten the laces as firmly as possible. I tie the bow and give the loops an extra tug to ensure that they are good and tight. Sometimes it works. Quite often it doesn’t and at some point I recognise that slap-flap and have to stop and retie my lace or laces. It’s a wonder I’ve not tripped myself up. (Ironically, when I did fall over my feet, or over an uneven it of pavement, last year my shoelaces had nothing to do with.) And this morning I read Coco Khan in the Guardian berating the sorry state of modern laces, echoing my own complaint:
“the failure of shoelaces has been my private obsession for some years now. You see, I have always been a fan of trainers, and in the 2010s new designs started to catch my eye – styles marketed as “cutting edge”, using “technical” materials, that seemed to be created for the “optimised”, “high performance”, heavily caffeinated girlboss going to the gym at 5am.
These high-performance laces often looked great. Many were thinner and rounder for neatness, with some synthetic or coated lines promising to maintain their clean appearance longer. But they also slip quicker. They do not do the one thing we ask of them. They do not stay tied.”
I’ve also been reading David Sidaris, who always makes me laugh. He wrote long ago about his obsession with achieving and over-achieving his step-count, extending his goal on a regular basis. Today he was writing about Duolingo, the language-learning app that so many people of my acquaintance are using. Here’s some of what he wrote:
“Duolingo was seemingly designed for people with an obsessive-compulsive disorder. The same could be said for my fitness-tracking Apple Watch. And so I had combined the two and was walking my minimum of 10 miles per day while pointlessly reading sentences out loud in Japanese, German, Spanish, and French. This turned me into the person whom, since the turn of this latest century, I have most hated: one who moves about while staring down at a device. On the busy sidewalk, at the airport, everywhere a person should be paying the utmost attention to those around them, I suddenly was not.
There was no excusing my behavior; this was simply who I was now. That’s it, I regularly told myself. Today is the last day I am doing this. But I was powerless to stop. Making it all the more pathetic, I was competing against people I didn’t know. People who may not even exist and have names like GeACzQDe and fuuuuu.”
I must say I share his dislike of people who walk along staring at the tiny screen. It’s amazing how often I have had to step aside to avoid collision. I especially dislike those who have to have a loud conversation wherever they are, seemingly unaware that there is no need to shout down your mobile phone. However, my disapproval extends to those who cannot go for a walk without their headphones, usually listening to some absolutely riveting podcast.
Mr Sidarisalso wrote about coming across a group of “No Kings!” protesters “whooping and chanting” on a street corner.
‘Most were of retirement age and brandished signs at the oncoming traffic. It was hot and muggy, yet one member of their group, a bearded man playing the accordion, wore a fleece-lined winter hat with flaps over his ears. It pained me to admit it, but they looked like kooks, like Tea Party demonstrators during Obama’s first term. Who cast this thing? I caught myself wondering, as they seemed the worst possible advertisement for the Democratic Party: “Join us! We folk-dance!”
As I passed them, I thought back to the early Civil Rights protesters: the well-groomed men in suits and ties, the women in dresses. All of their signs were clearly lettered, likely by professionals, none with crudely drawn penises on them or the word fuck.”
Quite so! But it’s not just protest placards that have become ruder and cruder. Of course I have no statistical evidence to back this us, but my general impression is that swearing, including what we used to think of as very crude bad language, has become “normalised”, “standardised”. It’s as though the world has become an angrier place. I just need to listen to Granddaughter Number Two expressing her opinions about anything and everything. But what do regular cussers do when something really gets under heir skin? How do they express that greater emotion?
Yesterday I went on a little about royal finances. Today I hear that Prince Harry is probably cancelling his planned family visit to the UK because he can’t get police protection. You would think he could afford some private security. I can appreciate that he doesn’t want his children subjected to unwanted paparazzi attention but i wonder how much walking about in public places the children would be doing. Knowing how my own grandchildren enjoy family reunions, especially spending time with their cousins of a similar age, I feel it’s rather sad that these otherwise privileged children are being deprived of it. So it goes.
Life goes ln. Stay safe and well, everyone!







